Monday, August 24, 2009

Minutes from 08.18.09

Participants: Kevin, Jeff, Brent, Emmanuelle, Jerome, Michael, Lisa

Date: 08.18.09

Summary of Discussion:


1. Water Catchment 


After careful review, we will have two separate systems: One on the east side of the house and one in front of the greenhouse. The east collection tank will be installed once the greenhouse tank is installed and we determine our water needs. This will be phased  and given time to be refined.

Presently we  need to know water usage inside and outside. Neil is tracking water use for the summer and the fall,  before and after irrigation. We should have a good sense of water usage by winter.

Over the next few months we need to figure out  current irrigation zone with TJ and determine our approach with the new landscape.

Lisa will also monitor water use at Elkstone Farm greenhouse , to decide on needs and interior system pumps, as they are having challenges with the gravity fed system. 

Cameron and Lisa will work on sizing the lower tanks to be ready for digging in the springs, and will coordinate with solar thermal.

Jeff will need information for final drawing to provide pricing as early as possible. Lisa and cameron will estimate tank size and a range estimate for the systems.


2. Energy 

1)Updated energy calculations are completed. The only other outstanding issues are any electrical requirements for catchment?

               -have allotted a limited number of contingency yearly (800) kWH

2)Current PV array size 15.7 kW dual axis including LED and lighting updates, allowing 1/2kw panels for contingencies. steamboat has an average of 240 days of sunny days, geothermal still has to be sized for peak load with 15 wells.

The cost of installation for 15 holes is too high. Kevin would like no more than 10 holes. We May need 200-400 gallon storing tank for solar thermal in addition to 200-400 gallon storing tank for geothermal.Kevin and Amy are very much willing to adjust their use of appliances and hot water to minimize peak load. Already they do not use multiple showers at the same time. Brent thinks that 10 wells might be reasonable (the TC test could also allow for lesser holes). Solar thermal 7 feet hight by 25 feet to fit on southern roof side.

3)Geo Loopfield Maximum is at 15 vertical wells (includes the peak for hot water, and limited Greenhouse heating). 

Vertical holes will fit, need to coordinate with landscaping

               -as low as 10 without peak hot water needs

               -48 evacuated cylinders will generate enough yearly hot water BTU’s, but some days are cloudy, especially in winter

               -242/365 average sunny days/year = 1/3 time will rely on boiler/geo therefore 15 wells are recommended

               -TC test may yield better numbers – shall we schedule for this fall?


4)Any other electrical needs?  Final call before I forward numbers to Susan.

 

5)Coordinate all services & piping with all other specialties

               -schedule?

Brent would like to produce final  set of schematic drawings for more accurate estimates,  so that solid numbers are there to jump off of. 

 3. Climate Battery Design

Michael reviewed drawings, there is also a radon detector... Jerome suggests that air is moving so much that is not a problem. But it it is not much cost to include a radon detector. Jeff recommends putting in the radon detector

Control panels will be specified through Wadsworth,  controls as they will be to combine all and control with a small computer. Jeff likes the cleanness and simplicity and is much more straight forward. 

Shade panels are necessarry for extreme temperatures, shade during hot days and insulate during cold days.

Planting walls could be built with metal, concrete and/or  mesh and stucco/plaster, which could be covered with tile. Longevity, toxicity and maintenance will need to be considered.

3 drawings 

4 intake raisers

3 exhaust risers


Action items:

1. Brent will provide drawing for 100% in about 2 weeks. 

2. Lisa and Cameron will submit a draft schematic designs for watercatchment for the s

3. Emmanuelle will schedule a visit Elkstone Farm to view shades, walls and planting

4. Lisa will provide material's collage for planting bed wall by Sept 1st

Monday, August 17, 2009

Agenda August 18th, 2009

Agenda August 18th , 2009

1. Water Catchment: (15 min) Lisa will review conversations with Cameron, Jeff and Neil. Discussion will include indoor and outdoor water consumptions. We will also discuss catchment design with two system specific areas and future use.

2. Energy: (15 min) Brent will provide an update on The following:
a) Updated energy calculations
b) Pv array sizing
c) Geothermal
d) Other electrical needs
e) Coordination with other specialities/scheduling?

3.GreenHouse: (15 min) Michael will review new climate battery design( 15min)

4. MISC/Questions: (15 min)

Climate Battery Design




Here are drawings for the Greenhouse Climate Battery, pricing and construction. We should discuss the planting bed retaining design, which is only hinted at in these specs as a vertical flagstone system. The design we developed for the Elkstone greenhouse is of corrugated metal planting bed walls, with special brackets that are buried in the beds. If you've seen these and like them, we can add that detail to the drawings.

Tuesday, August 11, 2009

Conference Call Scheduled for 8:30a.m. mst Tuesday August 18th

Proposed Agenda:

1.      1. Water Catchment – Lisa

2.     2. Energy Load – Brent

3.     3. Greenhouse Design – Michael

4.     4. Misc.

 

Sunday, August 2, 2009




Meeting: July  29, 2009

Participants: Kevin, Jeff, Hans, Brent, Cameron, John, Michael, Jerome, Lisa



Summary of Discussion: Basic review of  two catchment senarios


Scenario A: Tuesday Map


Pro's: 

most direct route of water to tank

utilizing natural low point in driveway

Minimal disturbance of utilities and native vegetation

greenhouse tank is lowest point on the property 

ties in with thermal mass of structure 


Con's: 

cost prohibitive? we need to find cost of asphalt cut? piping costs?

driveway disturbance

needs more noodling/egineering of how pipe meets new green house stem wall

tank underneath may be difficult to repair


Scenario B: Bud's Plan

could not get to upload please check you email to view!


Pro's: 

utilizes natural drainage

only disturb native vegetation

cost effective

tanks all together


Con's:

disturbs native vegetation

going around the horn, longer run

cautious about utilities

loss through evaporation/run time


note: Wetland will be the same either option. We can decide where to locate wetland cell that will look good aesthetically and function well. 



other points raised during discussion:


Timing: what timing is best for soil cut/fill, tanks?,as builts to facilitate precautions for catchment tanks? Hans had a great suggestion of saying it is for back up truck  water delivery in case of drought. What would be the order of digging?


Labeling: it will be necessary to put potable water /non potable water for health department


Trampoline: Would it make sense to coordinate with earth works? Where would we like it located?


Tank suggestions: drivable tanks were concrete sprayable poly urea?/ or matrix systems. There are also custom tanks. A pre made self contained  tank is more cost in materials( cost/sq ft, tank itself) and is much less in labor.  An onsite tank with matrix or custom build is less in materials (  cost/sq ft) but more in labor. 


Drip lines and drainage catchment: would be important to line the ditches with beno mat or other liner under landscape so as not to let water penetrate. We may use some natural raincatching techniques on the south side of the driveway to utilize water in the landscape. we like to utilize drip lines to the south and north of main door for direct landscape use.


Keep it Simple: Jerome suggested keeping it simple with greenhouse catchment and landscape catchment separate. also we need to look at the water needs both long term short term.



ACTION STEPS:

1. Cross section of a ditch from john and cameron

2. Evo to get cameron current and projected landscape water usage

3. review two options for landscape catchment scenario A and B

4. goals break out  session tuesday with jeff, hans, kevin, lisa

5. john will send sketches 

6. lisa will post all options

7. all numbers estimates for projects need to be in by august 30th


Note: Brent, Kevin and Jeff spoke after this call



attached is ditch sketch from john during the meeting